The "eroticization of violence" mediaACLU might be busy lately, but that doesn't mean they don't have time for Taylor Swift.
The Northern California branch of the non-profit organization came to the defense of a critic for PopFront Magazineafter the online publication received a letter demanding retraction and removal of a post that criticized the singer.
SEE ALSO: This one lyric from 'Gorgeous' is proof that the old Taylor Swift is not deadThe original post —"Swiftly to the alt-right: Taylor subtly gets the lower case kkk in formation"—explores the suggested connection between white supremacy, Swift's music, and her very vague politician affiliation leading up to the 2016 presidential election. It's a topic that has been explored in the past by several outlets whose articles are still online.
"Taylor’s lyrics in 'Look What You Made Me Do' seem to play to the same subtle, quiet white support of a racial hierarchy. Many on the alt-right see the song as part of a 're-awakening,' in line with Trump’s rise," the article reads. At another point, the author addresses the fact that "there is no way to know for sure if Taylor is a Trump supporter or identifies with the white nationalist message, but her silence has not gone unnoticed."
The letter from Swift's lawyers called this particular post a "malicious attack" against Swift "that goes to great lengths to portray Ms. Swift as some sort of white supremacist figurehead," and demanded PopFrontremove the post by Tuesday, Oct. 24, or possibly face further legal action from Swift.
"One thing is certain: you are requiring Ms. Swift, but not any other celebrity or musician, to loudly denounce white supremacy and you do not accept her previous condemnations as good enough. Given your apparent animus and malice toward Ms. Swift, the intent to cause harm to Ms. Swift is clear," the letter reads. It's worth noting that many celebrities have denounced white supremacy publicly.
In response, PopFronthas clarified that they will not be retracting the post.
"At a time when the press is under constant attack from the highest branches of government, this cease and desist letter is far more insidious than Swift and her lawyer may understand," the online magazine wrote in an official statement.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
"The press should not be bullied by legal action nor frightened into submission from covering any subject it chooses. Swift’s scare tactics may have worked in the past, but PopFront refuses to back down because we believe the First Amendment is more important than preserving a celebrity’s public image," the statement continues.
In the midst of accusing Swift of suppressing free speech, the ACLU—who has publicized a letter sent to Swift's legal team—had fun inserting her song titles in its responses.
"Intimidation tactics like these are unacceptable. Not in her wildest dreamscan Ms. Swift use copyright law to suppress this exposure of a threat to constitutionally protected speech," ACLU attorney Matt Cagle said in a press release. "Criticism is never pleasant, but a celebrity has to shake it off, even if the critique may damage her reputation."
Speaking of damaging a reputation, this all comes at a horrible time for Swift. Her album Reputation is set to be released at the end of this week.
You can read the full account from the ACLU here, and the entirety of the letter sent to PopFrontfrom Swift's legal team here.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
Trump won't be factTrump gets mocked after tweeting that the moon is part of Mars'The Wonder' review: Florence Pugh commands the screen in clash of science and faithWorld Cup apps Hayya and Ehteraz under scrutiny due to privacy concernsNetflix's 'Run for the Money' is straight out of a Stephen King bookCharli XCX and Diplo ride animated dolphins in new 'Spicy' videoHow internet ghost stories take on a life of their ownApple redesigns iCloud.com to make it far more customizableMiley Cyrus posts powerful message after man grabs her without her consentNamor enters the villain hall of fame in 'Black Panther: Wakanda Forever'USA vs Wales livestream: How to watch FIFA World Cup 2022 Group BGoogle Maps now has better search for EV charging stationsThe 9 best presidential candidate Instagram accounts'Cuphead,' the video game, is coming to Tesla, the carsElton John has defiant response after 'Rocketman' censored in RussiaElon Musk sends Twitter employees his weirdest email so farOne of SpongeBob's most iconic looks is now a really good memeWorld Cup apps Hayya and Ehteraz under scrutiny due to privacy concerns'Quordle' today: See each 'Quordle' answer and hints for November 19'Decibel Monitoring' on Apple Watch will tell you when it's too loud What We’re Loving: Stridentists, Oblivion by The Paris Review Someone to Watch Over Me by Nica Strunk John Jeremiah Sullivan Answers Your Questions by John Jeremiah Sullivan 'Vanderpump Rules' reunion: The most Scandovalous quotes Literary Put What We’re Loving: Watkins, Rothbart, Footman by The Paris Review Television Man: David Byrne on the Couch by Brian Gresko 'Yellowjackets': 10 burning questions we have for Season 3 Hemingway, Urdu, Doughnuts by Sadie Stein Mrs. Crist by Harry Stein Bookscapes, Book Gardens by Sadie Stein A Partial Inventory of Gustave Flaubert’s Personal Effects by Joanna Neborsky ChatGPT plugins face 'prompt injection' risk from third Honestly, I'm just tired. Stephen Colbert's election website shows you how to vote state Lindsey Graham said to use his own words against him. Twitter is on it Twitter is removing view count metrics from videos Writing: The Great Invention of the World by Sadie Stein On Cataloguing Flaubert by Charlotte Strick Letter from India: The Permit, Part 1 by Amie Barrodale
3.5572s , 8286.078125 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【"eroticization of violence" media】,Exquisite Information Network