【Tramas Ardientes S01 E09】

Facebook lets advertisers exclude users by "ethnic affinity,Tramas Ardientes S01 E09" according to a new report by ProPublica.

Companies buying targeted advertising through Facebook can exclude users who are determined to have an "affinity" for certain ethnic groups. A screenshot of an ad purchased by ProPublica and approved by Facebook shows users excluded by "ethnic affinity" for "African American (US)," "Asian American (US)," and "Hispanic (US - Spanish dominant.)"

Ads that exclude people based on race, gender and "other sensitive factors" are illegal under federal law in housing and employment, ProPublica noted. The news organization's approved ad was related to housing.

---

You May Also Like

---

---

SEE ALSO: Facebook is about to become more NSFW

A civil rights lawyer told ProPublicathe exclusionary advertising was "massively illegal."

Facebook said that race is not the same as its "ethnic affinity" category. Facebook users do not explicitly self-identify with any ethnic groups.

Facebook puts users in this category instead through their interests: liking BET or Ebony, reading content in Spanish or liking an Asian-American Chamber of Commerce.

Mashable Trend Report Decode what’s viral, what’s next, and what it all means. Sign up for Mashable’s weekly Trend Report newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

Facebook says that users don't have to be of a certain ethnic group to have interests that would place them in an ethnic affinity category.

Facebook said these ads have been used to target Hispanic-Americans during the 2014 World Cup, for companies that sell African-American hair products and for Spanish beer.

SEE ALSO: Facebook's livestream had one big advantage over everybody else

"We are committed to providing people with quality ad experiences, which includes helping people see messages that are both relevant to the cultural communities they are interested in and have content that reflects or represents their communities -- not just generic content that's targeted to mass audiences," Facebook said in a statement. "We believe that multicultural advertising should be a tool for empowerment. We take a strong stand against advertisers misusing our platform: our policies prohibit using our targeting options to discriminate, and they require compliance with the law. We take prompt enforcement action when we determine that ads violate our policies."

Despite the distinction between targeting or excluding specific members of a race or ethnic group versus people who have expressed an "affinity" for that race or ethnic group, ProPublica's reporting found that ads using these tools could still be illegal.

Facebook said it is looking into the ad ProPublica purchased and how it was approved. The social networking company said the ad was not for housing exactly, but was instead for a renters' forum related to housing, pointing to the ad as evidence.

Original image has been replaced. Credit: Mashable

Other companies have come under criticism for similar targeted advertising before. A Harvard professor in 2013 found that Google ads related to background checks and arrest records appeared during searches for more "black-sounding names." Google's ad algorithm also showed ads for higher-paying jobs to more men than women.

Facebook released a blog post about the issue.

• Social Good
• Tech
• Life
• Entertainment
• Science
• Digital Culture
• Deals
• Shopping

• Reality Distortion Field: 10 Things Apple Won't Directly Say But We'll Infer About the iPhone X
• Redux: Furry Faces by The Paris Review
• Redux: Literary Gossip by The Paris Review
• Redux: Great Blinding Flashes by The Paris Review
• Best robot vacuum deal: Eufy Omni C20 robot vacuum and mop $300 off at Amazon
• Redux: Another Drink by The Paris Review
• Parables and Diaries by The Paris Review
• Redux: Great Blinding Flashes by The Paris Review
• The Amazon Book Sale is coming April 23 through 28
• Redux: An Ordinary Word by The Paris Review

• The false opulence of the cheat day video
• Apple might launch slightly larger iPad Pro models in 2024
• Oxford English Dictionary added 18 new LGBTQ terms in 2022
• 'Quordle' today: See each 'Quordle' answer and hints for January 2
• Inside the deeply weird fake
• Forever 21 might be going under, but at least we have these memes
• CES 2023 trends: AI and the metaverse may rule, but 'basic' tech still stands out
• The best true crime TikTok accounts of 2022
• 17 times parents helped their kids cheat the system
• BangBros bought a porn doxxing site just to literally set it on fire

• Amazon Prime Grubhub deal: Save $10 off orders of $20 or more
• Wordle today: The answer and hints for January 20
• Jamaica Kincaid Will Receive Our 2022 Hadada Award by The Paris Review
• Bop House, an OnlyFans creator mansion, is dividing the internet
• Mary Shows Up
• The Dress by Cynthia Zarin
• Wordle today: The answer and hints for January 19
• Photographic Neuroses: Alec Soth's A Pound of Pictures by Gideon Jacobs
• Hidden Siri Commands and Unusual Responses
• Cooking with Dorothy Sayers by Valerie Stivers

• Episode 4: The Wave of the Future
• Apple AirPods deal: AirPods under $100
• Our Staff’s Favorite Books of 2021 by The Paris Review
• Apple employees can buy the Vision Pro at a 25 percent discount
• Robin Triumphant
• Jamaica Kincaid Will Receive Our 2022 Hadada Award by The Paris Review
• Redux: Vulnerable to an Epiphany by The Paris Review
• Conversations to the Tune of Air
• Dell S3422DWG Gaming Monitor deal: save $100 at Amazon
• Pornhub will require proof of consent from all performers