Facebook knows it has a trust problem.
In an effort to better manage how its users flag content they object to,erotice movie like love the social media giant is planning to rate the trustworthiness of its users on an individual basis. However, the initiative comes at a time when Facebook has lost the confidence of the American people on numerous fronts ranging from its ability to protect users' private data to the veracity of the information promoted by the platform on News Feed, surveys show.
SEE ALSO: How to completely delete Facebook from your lifeThe Washington Post reports the company "has begun to assign its users a reputation score, predicting their trustworthiness on a scale from zero to 1." The score, which was reportedly developed this year, is used for internal calculations by Facebook and does not appear to be displayed in any public capacity.
Ostensibly, the scores are used to determine which users provide correct feedback about the accuracy of articles shared on the site. Which, if you're a half-trillion dollar company looking to outsource vital labor to its users, sounds like an OK idea.
However, a lot about just what the so-called trustworthiness score is remains unknown. The Postwrites that in addition to a lack of clarity on how they are calculated, we also don't know all the specific ways in which the scores are used. We don't even know if everyone on Facebook has a trustworthiness rating, or whether that potentially ignominious ranking is reserved for a lucky few.
There are some things we do know, however. In March of this year, the Pew Research Center published survey data showing that "[while] a substantial share of Americans get news from Facebook and other social media sites, very few people express much trust in information on these sites."
Specifically, continues Pew, "[only] 5% of online Americans say they have 'a lot' of trust in the information they get from social media sites."
But the fun doesn't stop there. The Business Insider Intelligence's 2018 Digital Trust survey found that 81 percent of those surveyed had "little to no confidence that Facebook will protect their data and privacy."
Essentially, people neither trust Facebook as company nor as a service. With Facebook now looking to surreptitiously quantify whether or not the people who spend their lives on its site are liars, it seems like the distrust goes both ways.
Facebook, which has credibly been accused of misleading regulators, elected officials, and the press before, disputes the Washington Post'sreporting. When reached for comment, a Facebook spokesperson claimed this was all much ado about nothing.
"The idea that we have a centralized 'reputation' score for people that use Facebook is just plain wrong and the headline in the Washington Post is misleading," wrote the spokesperson. "What we’re actually doing: We developed a process to protect against people indiscriminately flagging news as fake and attempting to game the system. The reason we do this is to make sure that our fight against misinformation is as effective as possible.”
Which, if accurate, sounds fine. If only there was some sort of way to determine whether or not Facebook is trustworthy.
Topics Facebook Social Media
These cotton candy iceHillary Clinton to young girls: ‘You are more than the way you look'Break us off a piece of Chance the Rapper singing the Kit Kat jingleGoogle Home arrives in November and costs less than Amazon's EchoHardworking police dog enjoys a refreshing Starbucks puppuccinoHardworking police dog enjoys a refreshing Starbucks puppuccino'Stranger Things'' Eleven becomes Elle in 'Legally Blonde' in wild fan ficThe hilarious Messages app Apple doesn't want you to haveAmazon cracks down on ‘incentivized reviews’Here's why you shouldn't experiment with your plastic £5 notesElon Musk on X: 'I regret some of my posts' about TrumpProud cat owner dresses cat as ewokThat Hurricane Matthew forecast you keep seeing may not mean what you thinkGuy responsible for creating clown fear tells everyone to chillBest Sonos deal: Save $20 on Sonos Era 100The first inhabitants of Vanuatu and Tonga came from Taiwan, report saysIf Google just bested the iPhone, it needs to troll Apple harderIceland's Pirate Party could actually win big in the next electionGoogle Home arrives in November and costs less than Amazon's EchoDramatic video shows a kitten being rescued from a 12 Sea and Fog: The Art of Etel Adnan by Nana Asfour Farewell to Meat: At Masopust, the Czech Festival of Spring The Paris Review of the Air—and Land, and Sea “Mating” Book Club, Part 7: Getting Real in the Desert Photos from Dhallywood, Bangladesh’s Film Capital Photos from Our 2015 Spring Revel Lori Nix’s Dioramas Present Post Nobuo Okano, Book Repairman Poem: William Matthews’s “April in the Berkshires” On Canceling Plans You’ve Forgot You Made Better Call Caravaggio: “Saul” Borrows from Baroque Painting Watch: Nabokov Shows Off His Many Editions of “Lolita” Literary Feuds: John Irving and J. P. Donleavy Wordsworth’s Most Famous Poem Turns 200 The Gym as a Historical Temple of Fitness “Lady” and Its Discontents Feminist Fumes: Anicka Yi’s Miasmatic Art On Elvis and Teddy Bears Gunter Grass Is Dead at Eighty “Mating” Book Club, Part 4: Socialism vs. Capitalism. Fight.
2.7324s , 8289.046875 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【erotice movie like love】,Exquisite Information Network