As well as shutting down trolls and eroticism in the bibleslamming Donald Trump, one of J.K. Rowling's other favourite Twitter past-times is micro-blogging her writing process.
SEE ALSO: All the 'Harry Potter' Easter eggs you missed in the 'Fantastic Beasts' openingShe's previously shared advice for aspiring writers, and on one memorable occasion she even posted photos of the rejection letters she'd received in the past.
On Thursday, Rowling was clearly in a sharing mood.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
Throughout the evening, she began responding to comments and questions from fans.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
Soon the conversation turned to Fantastic Beasts 2.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
And, inevitably, onto the subject of spoilers.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
Rather than refusing to answer, though, Rowling tweeted this cryptic response.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
Okay, okay: so that's not exactly much to go on, is it?
But just the fact that it isa spoiler (and a big one, at that) tells us that Newt's patronus is obviously going to feature heavily in the second film.
And what do we know about patronus'? Well, as was the case with Snape, they can be influenced by a person that the wizard or witch has been in love with.
Combine that with the fact J.K. Rowling has already said we'll find out more about Leta Lestrange -- Newt's childhood love -- in the next film, and it seems likely that Newt's patronus will have something to do with her.
Topics JK Rowling X/Twitter
The Life and Times of the Literary Agent Georges BorchardtMy Own Boundaries Seem to Be Fading: An Interview with Lauren GroffNabokov Reads “The Ballad of Longwood Glen” by The Paris ReviewThe Man Behind the WeegeePoetry Rx: I Wish You a Tongue Scalded by TeaPhilip Roth, 1933–2018The #MeToo Poem That Brought Down Korea's Most Revered PoetStaff Picks: Kendrick, Cardi Covers, and Cautionary TalesWriters’ Fridges: Carmen Maria MachadoRedux: Reading About Mom by The Paris ReviewCooking With Pather PanchaliStaff Picks: Kendrick, Cardi Covers, and Cautionary TalesGertrude Stein's Mutual Portraiture SocietyMuriel Rukeyser, Mother of Everyone by Sam HuberStaff Picks: Smugglers, Lovers, and Dead HusbandsYou, Too, Can Live in Norman Mailer’s HousePhilip Roth, 1933–2018The #MeToo Poem That Brought Down Korea's Most Revered PoetYou, Too, Can Live in Norman Mailer’s HouseIt’s Strange the Way the Lord Does Move On Stanley Kunitz and the Fine Arts Work Center by Geoffrey Hilsabeck City Dreams by Bodys Isek Kingelez Redux: A State of Hyperconsciousness Cooking with Fyodor Dostoyevsky by Valerie Stivers On Writing Letters to Famous Strangers by A. M. Homes The Burning House by Hanya Yanagihara The Vocabulary of Tourism: An Interview with Laura van den Berg The Rare Women in the Rare Donald Hall, Who Gave His Life to Work and Eros Poetry Rx: Listen I Love You Joy Is Coming A Life of Reading Is Never Lonely America’s First Female Mapmaker by Ted Widmer ‘Girl, Interrupted,’ Twenty Staff Picks: Bandits, Revenge, and Decapitated Animals by The Paris Review Hero’s Journey: An Interview with Taylor Mac A Disgruntled Federal Employee’s 1980s Desk Calendar The Vanishing of Reality by Michiko Kakutani Destined for the Dirty The Saddest Songs Are the Ones About Flowers by Drew Bratcher Staff Picks: Mermaids, Wrestlers, and Gawkers by The Paris Review
3.3968s , 8264.1796875 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【eroticism in the bible】,Exquisite Information Network